Follow Slashdot blog updates by subscribing to our blog RSS feed

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment Re: Government Sponsored Research (Score 0) 265

I am not a capitalist. I'm free enterprise, the free exchange of goods and services kind of guy. Subtle but distinct difference.

If one wants the protection of Patents (which I'm 100% okay with), one ought to pay for that privilege, in taxes. 100% completely voluntary with the benefits of patents expiring when nobody wants to pay the tax. Mutually beneficial Exchange being key component.

Comment Government Sponsored Research (Score 0, Redundant) 265

As a Libertarian, I don't suppose to support tax payer funded research. Mainly because such research leads to patents and other protections that are held not by the public for the public good, but rather commercial for profit corporations.

IMHO, the best case for solving THIS issue is tax patent holders for their patents they enforce, as a TAX. Make it steep. Stop paying the tax, the patent goes public domain. This solves a whole bunch of abuses. Make private research funded patents less taxed, and those discovery/inventions that had public funded (tax payer) at the highest rates. Tax the rich, but make it avoidable, just release to the public domain.

The protection of intellectual property ought to come at a cost.

Comment Re:Epistemology (Score 1) 109

There are really two choices, that General Relativity is horribly wrong by a few orders of magnitude.

False Dichotomy. Newtonian Physics works pretty darn well for a lot of situations, is simple, so much so, we still use it because it is practical. But it is wrong.

For all we know, Einstein's equations may be suffering the same basic problem, we just haven't figured out why it isn't working where we see it not working as expected. But it works for a large number of scenarios that it is still usable.

That is my current working theory ;-)

Comment Re: Royalties (Score 1) 52

You seem to think that only the R are on the take. It is clear, everyone in DC is on the take. The only difference is which team you're on as to whether or not you care (or don't care).

They are all Hypocrites, talking out of whichever side of the mouth gets them elected again, so they can grift off the taxpayers.

"But the other side is worse" you might say. Sure, Fine. The shit sandwich is better over there with you.

Comment Re: Router (Score 1) 43

Lifespan of the HW is the important detail here. My home is not 99.99999% Uptime required. I don't need "Cisco" grade anything for the "Cisco" grade price. pfSense is good enough for home, it HAS support available (commercial grade) but I do not require it, because I'm not needing 99.99999% Uptime and 1 hour response time.

My current hardware has been running over 5 years. It needs to be replaced. Even Commercial grade needs replacement, even if it is just for obsolescence, eventually. My WiFi Router isn't routing anything, it is just an AP at this point. I use NONE of the features on it, other than getting clients on the network. Neither DHCP nor DNS is served by it. The point being, I do not Trust the OS on it, and cannot upgrade or swap it out due to Proprietary Blobs and OpenWRT is not ever going to run on it, and I don't like the HW that OpenWRT does run on (for other reasons). Therefore, it sits there being an AP serving clients, behind an actual Firewall/Router.

I'm happy you found OpenWRT setup you like. I used to by WiFi Routers that had OpenWRT, and I like the OS. So this is not a bash against that OS. I just have chosen a different route.

Slashdot Top Deals

If you can't understand it, it is intuitively obvious.

Working...